The Public Record · Docket FS-2025-0001

Read the comments.

Every public comment on the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule, sorted by what it talks about. Pick a topic, then narrow by position, by how hard the comment is for the agency to set aside, or by how substantive it is. Each comment is shown in full, as filed. How comments are classified and scored is explained in the Comment Analysis.

1 unique comments12 submissions

Position

Opposes rescission 100.0%

Answerability

A1 strong 0
A2 moderate 0
A3 weak 0
A0 none 1

Substance /24

Median 6middle half 6–6 · 1 scored

Topics raised

12 submissions in this letter's group · showing 1–12Clear all filters

Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Sep 16, 2026FS-2025-0001-419315
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 12 submissions in its group.
I am writing to express my strong opposition to any proposal that would rescind or weaken the Roadless Rule in California. Protecting our remaining 4.4 million acres of inventoried roadless areas is absolutely critical to safeguarding the state’s water quality, world-class recreation, and ecological health. Specifically, I urge you to maintain protections for these areas based on the following critical impacts:Downstream Water Supply: California’s roadless areas act as natural water filtration systems. Most of our Wild and Scenic Rivers flow directly into major reservoirs that supply drinking water to downstream communities and sustain California's vital agricultural sector. Rescinding these protections will increase erosion, sedimentation, and runoff from resource extraction, driving up water treatment costs for local municipalities.Ecosystem and Watershed Health: Decades of scientific research, including the Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, conclusively prove that watersheds with fewer roads are the biologically healthiest. They provide critical, undisturbed refuges for declining native fish and wildlife species.World-Class Recreation: These undeveloped lands secure access to premier, irreplaceable class III-V whitewater boating and angling opportunities on iconic waterways like the Middle Fork Feather, North Fork American, Tuolumne, Merced, Kings, and North Fork Kern Rivers. Roads and subsequent industrial development will permanently degrade these recreational treasures.Wildfire Risk: Building more infrastructure and roads into wild forests introduces higher human activity, which is a primary driver of accidental wildfire ignitions. The Forest Service already possesses the necessary authority to manage fuels and suppress fires in roadless areas without constructing permanent, high-maintenance roads.Please protect California's watersheds, economies, and wild places by keeping the Roadless Rule fully intact. Sincerely, Janet Geren Sincerely, Janet Geren Shasta Lake, CA 96089
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Sep 14, 2026FS-2025-0001-377961
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 12 submissions in its group.
I am writing to express my strong opposition to any proposal that would rescind or weaken the Roadless Rule in California. Protecting our remaining 4.4 million acres of inventoried roadless areas is absolutely critical to safeguarding the state’s water quality, world-class recreation, and ecological health. Specifically, I urge you to maintain protections for these areas based on the following critical impacts:Downstream Water Supply: California’s roadless areas act as natural water filtration systems. Most of our Wild and Scenic Rivers flow directly into major reservoirs that supply drinking water to downstream communities and sustain California's vital agricultural sector. Rescinding these protections will increase erosion, sedimentation, and runoff from resource extraction, driving up water treatment costs for local municipalities.Ecosystem and Watershed Health: Decades of scientific research, including the Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, conclusively prove that watersheds with fewer roads are the biologically healthiest. They provide critical, undisturbed refuges for declining native fish and wildlife species.World-Class Recreation: These undeveloped lands secure access to premier, irreplaceable class III-V whitewater boating and angling opportunities on iconic waterways like the Middle Fork Feather, North Fork American, Tuolumne, Merced, Kings, and North Fork Kern Rivers. Roads and subsequent industrial development will permanently degrade these recreational treasures.Wildfire Risk: Building more infrastructure and roads into wild forests introduces higher human activity, which is a primary driver of accidental wildfire ignitions. The Forest Service already possesses the necessary authority to manage fuels and suppress fires in roadless areas without constructing permanent, high-maintenance roads.Please protect California's watersheds, economies, and wild places by keeping the Roadless Rule fully intact. Sincerely, Janet Geren Sincerely, Janet Geren Shasta Lake, CA 96089
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Sep 14, 2026FS-2025-0001-385804
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 12 submissions in its group.
I am writing to express my strong opposition to any proposal that would rescind or weaken the Roadless Rule in California. Protecting our remaining 4.4 million acres of inventoried roadless areas is absolutely critical to safeguarding the state’s water quality, world-class recreation, and ecological health. Specifically, I urge you to maintain protections for these areas based on the following critical impacts:Downstream Water Supply: California’s roadless areas act as natural water filtration systems. Most of our Wild and Scenic Rivers flow directly into major reservoirs that supply drinking water to downstream communities and sustain California's vital agricultural sector. Rescinding these protections will increase erosion, sedimentation, and runoff from resource extraction, driving up water treatment costs for local municipalities.Ecosystem and Watershed Health: Decades of scientific research, including the Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, conclusively prove that watersheds with fewer roads are the biologically healthiest. They provide critical, undisturbed refuges for declining native fish and wildlife species.World-Class Recreation: These undeveloped lands secure access to premier, irreplaceable class III-V whitewater boating and angling opportunities on iconic waterways like the Middle Fork Feather, North Fork American, Tuolumne, Merced, Kings, and North Fork Kern Rivers. Roads and subsequent industrial development will permanently degrade these recreational treasures.Wildfire Risk: Building more infrastructure and roads into wild forests introduces higher human activity, which is a primary driver of accidental wildfire ignitions. The Forest Service already possesses the necessary authority to manage fuels and suppress fires in roadless areas without constructing permanent, high-maintenance roads.Please protect California's watersheds, economies, and wild places by keeping the Roadless Rule fully intact. Sincerely, Janet Geren Sincerely, Janet Geren Shasta Lake, CA 96089
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Sep 14, 2026FS-2025-0001-387442
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 12 submissions in its group.
I am writing to express my strong opposition to any proposal that would rescind or weaken the Roadless Rule in California. Protecting our remaining 4.4 million acres of inventoried roadless areas is absolutely critical to safeguarding the state’s water quality, world-class recreation, and ecological health. Specifically, I urge you to maintain protections for these areas based on the following critical impacts:Downstream Water Supply: California’s roadless areas act as natural water filtration systems. Most of our Wild and Scenic Rivers flow directly into major reservoirs that supply drinking water to downstream communities and sustain California's vital agricultural sector. Rescinding these protections will increase erosion, sedimentation, and runoff from resource extraction, driving up water treatment costs for local municipalities.Ecosystem and Watershed Health: Decades of scientific research, including the Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, conclusively prove that watersheds with fewer roads are the biologically healthiest. They provide critical, undisturbed refuges for declining native fish and wildlife species.World-Class Recreation: These undeveloped lands secure access to premier, irreplaceable class III-V whitewater boating and angling opportunities on iconic waterways like the Middle Fork Feather, North Fork American, Tuolumne, Merced, Kings, and North Fork Kern Rivers. Roads and subsequent industrial development will permanently degrade these recreational treasures.Wildfire Risk: Building more infrastructure and roads into wild forests introduces higher human activity, which is a primary driver of accidental wildfire ignitions. The Forest Service already possesses the necessary authority to manage fuels and suppress fires in roadless areas without constructing permanent, high-maintenance roads.Please protect California's watersheds, economies, and wild places by keeping the Roadless Rule fully intact. Sincerely, Janet Geren Sincerely, Janet Geren Shasta Lake, CA 96089
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Sep 14, 2026FS-2025-0001-400840
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 12 submissions in its group.
I am writing to express my strong opposition to any proposal that would rescind or weaken the Roadless Rule in California. Protecting our remaining 4.4 million acres of inventoried roadless areas is absolutely critical to safeguarding the state’s water quality, world-class recreation, and ecological health. Specifically, I urge you to maintain protections for these areas based on the following critical impacts:Downstream Water Supply: California’s roadless areas act as natural water filtration systems. Most of our Wild and Scenic Rivers flow directly into major reservoirs that supply drinking water to downstream communities and sustain California's vital agricultural sector. Rescinding these protections will increase erosion, sedimentation, and runoff from resource extraction, driving up water treatment costs for local municipalities.Ecosystem and Watershed Health: Decades of scientific research, including the Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, conclusively prove that watersheds with fewer roads are the biologically healthiest. They provide critical, undisturbed refuges for declining native fish and wildlife species.World-Class Recreation: These undeveloped lands secure access to premier, irreplaceable class III-V whitewater boating and angling opportunities on iconic waterways like the Middle Fork Feather, North Fork American, Tuolumne, Merced, Kings, and North Fork Kern Rivers. Roads and subsequent industrial development will permanently degrade these recreational treasures.Wildfire Risk: Building more infrastructure and roads into wild forests introduces higher human activity, which is a primary driver of accidental wildfire ignitions. The Forest Service already possesses the necessary authority to manage fuels and suppress fires in roadless areas without constructing permanent, high-maintenance roads.Please protect California's watersheds, economies, and wild places by keeping the Roadless Rule fully intact. Sincerely, Janet Geren Sincerely, Janet Geren Shasta Lake, CA 96089
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Sep 13, 2026FS-2025-0001-372088
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 12 submissions in its group.
I am writing to express my strong opposition to any proposal that would rescind or weaken the Roadless Rule in California. Protecting our remaining 4.4 million acres of inventoried roadless areas is absolutely critical to safeguarding the state’s water quality, world-class recreation, and ecological health. Specifically, I urge you to maintain protections for these areas based on the following critical impacts:Downstream Water Supply: California’s roadless areas act as natural water filtration systems. Most of our Wild and Scenic Rivers flow directly into major reservoirs that supply drinking water to downstream communities and sustain California's vital agricultural sector. Rescinding these protections will increase erosion, sedimentation, and runoff from resource extraction, driving up water treatment costs for local municipalities.Ecosystem and Watershed Health: Decades of scientific research, including the Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, conclusively prove that watersheds with fewer roads are the biologically healthiest. They provide critical, undisturbed refuges for declining native fish and wildlife species.World-Class Recreation: These undeveloped lands secure access to premier, irreplaceable class III-V whitewater boating and angling opportunities on iconic waterways like the Middle Fork Feather, North Fork American, Tuolumne, Merced, Kings, and North Fork Kern Rivers. Roads and subsequent industrial development will permanently degrade these recreational treasures.Wildfire Risk: Building more infrastructure and roads into wild forests introduces higher human activity, which is a primary driver of accidental wildfire ignitions. The Forest Service already possesses the necessary authority to manage fuels and suppress fires in roadless areas without constructing permanent, high-maintenance roads.Please protect California's watersheds, economies, and wild places by keeping the Roadless Rule fully intact. Sincerely, Janet Geren Sincerely, Janet Geren Shasta Lake, CA 96089
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-345110
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 12 submissions in its group.
I am writing to express my strong opposition to any proposal that would rescind or weaken the Roadless Rule in California. Protecting our remaining 4.4 million acres of inventoried roadless areas is absolutely critical to safeguarding the state’s water quality, world-class recreation, and ecological health. Specifically, I urge you to maintain protections for these areas based on the following critical impacts:Downstream Water Supply: California’s roadless areas act as natural water filtration systems. Most of our Wild and Scenic Rivers flow directly into major reservoirs that supply drinking water to downstream communities and sustain California's vital agricultural sector. Rescinding these protections will increase erosion, sedimentation, and runoff from resource extraction, driving up water treatment costs for local municipalities.Ecosystem and Watershed Health: Decades of scientific research, including the Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, conclusively prove that watersheds with fewer roads are the biologically healthiest. They provide critical, undisturbed refuges for declining native fish and wildlife species.World-Class Recreation: These undeveloped lands secure access to premier, irreplaceable class III-V whitewater boating and angling opportunities on iconic waterways like the Middle Fork Feather, North Fork American, Tuolumne, Merced, Kings, and North Fork Kern Rivers. Roads and subsequent industrial development will permanently degrade these recreational treasures.Wildfire Risk: Building more infrastructure and roads into wild forests introduces higher human activity, which is a primary driver of accidental wildfire ignitions. The Forest Service already possesses the necessary authority to manage fuels and suppress fires in roadless areas without constructing permanent, high-maintenance roads.Please protect California's watersheds, economies, and wild places by keeping the Roadless Rule fully intact. Sincerely, Janet Geren Sincerely, Janet Geren Shasta Lake, CA 96089
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-348323
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 12 submissions in its group.
I am writing to express my strong opposition to any proposal that would rescind or weaken the Roadless Rule in California. Protecting our remaining 4.4 million acres of inventoried roadless areas is absolutely critical to safeguarding the state’s water quality, world-class recreation, and ecological health. Specifically, I urge you to maintain protections for these areas based on the following critical impacts:Downstream Water Supply: California’s roadless areas act as natural water filtration systems. Most of our Wild and Scenic Rivers flow directly into major reservoirs that supply drinking water to downstream communities and sustain California's vital agricultural sector. Rescinding these protections will increase erosion, sedimentation, and runoff from resource extraction, driving up water treatment costs for local municipalities.Ecosystem and Watershed Health: Decades of scientific research, including the Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, conclusively prove that watersheds with fewer roads are the biologically healthiest. They provide critical, undisturbed refuges for declining native fish and wildlife species.World-Class Recreation: These undeveloped lands secure access to premier, irreplaceable class III-V whitewater boating and angling opportunities on iconic waterways like the Middle Fork Feather, North Fork American, Tuolumne, Merced, Kings, and North Fork Kern Rivers. Roads and subsequent industrial development will permanently degrade these recreational treasures.Wildfire Risk: Building more infrastructure and roads into wild forests introduces higher human activity, which is a primary driver of accidental wildfire ignitions. The Forest Service already possesses the necessary authority to manage fuels and suppress fires in roadless areas without constructing permanent, high-maintenance roads.Please protect California's watersheds, economies, and wild places by keeping the Roadless Rule fully intact. Sincerely, Janet Geren Sincerely, Janet Geren Shasta Lake, CA 96089
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-351906
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 12 submissions in its group.
I am writing to express my strong opposition to any proposal that would rescind or weaken the Roadless Rule in California. Protecting our remaining 4.4 million acres of inventoried roadless areas is absolutely critical to safeguarding the state’s water quality, world-class recreation, and ecological health. Specifically, I urge you to maintain protections for these areas based on the following critical impacts:Downstream Water Supply: California’s roadless areas act as natural water filtration systems. Most of our Wild and Scenic Rivers flow directly into major reservoirs that supply drinking water to downstream communities and sustain California's vital agricultural sector. Rescinding these protections will increase erosion, sedimentation, and runoff from resource extraction, driving up water treatment costs for local municipalities.Ecosystem and Watershed Health: Decades of scientific research, including the Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, conclusively prove that watersheds with fewer roads are the biologically healthiest. They provide critical, undisturbed refuges for declining native fish and wildlife species.World-Class Recreation: These undeveloped lands secure access to premier, irreplaceable class III-V whitewater boating and angling opportunities on iconic waterways like the Middle Fork Feather, North Fork American, Tuolumne, Merced, Kings, and North Fork Kern Rivers. Roads and subsequent industrial development will permanently degrade these recreational treasures.Wildfire Risk: Building more infrastructure and roads into wild forests introduces higher human activity, which is a primary driver of accidental wildfire ignitions. The Forest Service already possesses the necessary authority to manage fuels and suppress fires in roadless areas without constructing permanent, high-maintenance roads.Please protect California's watersheds, economies, and wild places by keeping the Roadless Rule fully intact. Sincerely, Janet Geren Sincerely, Janet Geren Shasta Lake, CA 96089
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-359762
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.This comment stands for all 12 submissions in its group.
I am writing to express my strong opposition to any proposal that would rescind or weaken the Roadless Rule in California. Protecting our remaining 4.4 million acres of inventoried roadless areas is absolutely critical to safeguarding the state’s water quality, world-class recreation, and ecological health. Specifically, I urge you to maintain protections for these areas based on the following critical impacts:Downstream Water Supply: California’s roadless areas act as natural water filtration systems. Most of our Wild and Scenic Rivers flow directly into major reservoirs that supply drinking water to downstream communities and sustain California's vital agricultural sector. Rescinding these protections will increase erosion, sedimentation, and runoff from resource extraction, driving up water treatment costs for local municipalities.Ecosystem and Watershed Health: Decades of scientific research, including the Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, conclusively prove that watersheds with fewer roads are the biologically healthiest. They provide critical, undisturbed refuges for declining native fish and wildlife species.World-Class Recreation: These undeveloped lands secure access to premier, irreplaceable class III-V whitewater boating and angling opportunities on iconic waterways like the Middle Fork Feather, North Fork American, Tuolumne, Merced, Kings, and North Fork Kern Rivers. Roads and subsequent industrial development will permanently degrade these recreational treasures.Wildfire Risk: Building more infrastructure and roads into wild forests introduces higher human activity, which is a primary driver of accidental wildfire ignitions. The Forest Service already possesses the necessary authority to manage fuels and suppress fires in roadless areas without constructing permanent, high-maintenance roads.Please protect California's watersheds, economies, and wild places by keeping the Roadless Rule fully intact. Sincerely, Janet Geren Sincerely, Janet Geren Shasta Lake, CA 96089
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-361867
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 12 submissions in its group.
I am writing to express my strong opposition to any proposal that would rescind or weaken the Roadless Rule in California. Protecting our remaining 4.4 million acres of inventoried roadless areas is absolutely critical to safeguarding the state’s water quality, world-class recreation, and ecological health. Specifically, I urge you to maintain protections for these areas based on the following critical impacts:Downstream Water Supply: California’s roadless areas act as natural water filtration systems. Most of our Wild and Scenic Rivers flow directly into major reservoirs that supply drinking water to downstream communities and sustain California's vital agricultural sector. Rescinding these protections will increase erosion, sedimentation, and runoff from resource extraction, driving up water treatment costs for local municipalities.Ecosystem and Watershed Health: Decades of scientific research, including the Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, conclusively prove that watersheds with fewer roads are the biologically healthiest. They provide critical, undisturbed refuges for declining native fish and wildlife species.World-Class Recreation: These undeveloped lands secure access to premier, irreplaceable class III-V whitewater boating and angling opportunities on iconic waterways like the Middle Fork Feather, North Fork American, Tuolumne, Merced, Kings, and North Fork Kern Rivers. Roads and subsequent industrial development will permanently degrade these recreational treasures.Wildfire Risk: Building more infrastructure and roads into wild forests introduces higher human activity, which is a primary driver of accidental wildfire ignitions. The Forest Service already possesses the necessary authority to manage fuels and suppress fires in roadless areas without constructing permanent, high-maintenance roads.Please protect California's watersheds, economies, and wild places by keeping the Roadless Rule fully intact. Sincerely, Janet Geren Sincerely, Janet Geren Shasta Lake, CA 96089
Full analysis of this comment →
Opposes rescissionA0 noneSubstance 6/24Sep 12, 2026FS-2025-0001-363759
PLACESTANDDOCGAPEVIDASKALTLAW
Campaign — One letter sent by 10 or more people, copied or lightly reworded. See the letter, its submissions and topics.One of 12 submissions in its group.
I am writing to express my strong opposition to any proposal that would rescind or weaken the Roadless Rule in California. Protecting our remaining 4.4 million acres of inventoried roadless areas is absolutely critical to safeguarding the state’s water quality, world-class recreation, and ecological health. Specifically, I urge you to maintain protections for these areas based on the following critical impacts:Downstream Water Supply: California’s roadless areas act as natural water filtration systems. Most of our Wild and Scenic Rivers flow directly into major reservoirs that supply drinking water to downstream communities and sustain California's vital agricultural sector. Rescinding these protections will increase erosion, sedimentation, and runoff from resource extraction, driving up water treatment costs for local municipalities.Ecosystem and Watershed Health: Decades of scientific research, including the Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, conclusively prove that watersheds with fewer roads are the biologically healthiest. They provide critical, undisturbed refuges for declining native fish and wildlife species.World-Class Recreation: These undeveloped lands secure access to premier, irreplaceable class III-V whitewater boating and angling opportunities on iconic waterways like the Middle Fork Feather, North Fork American, Tuolumne, Merced, Kings, and North Fork Kern Rivers. Roads and subsequent industrial development will permanently degrade these recreational treasures.Wildfire Risk: Building more infrastructure and roads into wild forests introduces higher human activity, which is a primary driver of accidental wildfire ignitions. The Forest Service already possesses the necessary authority to manage fuels and suppress fires in roadless areas without constructing permanent, high-maintenance roads.Please protect California's watersheds, economies, and wild places by keeping the Roadless Rule fully intact. Sincerely, Janet Geren Sincerely, Janet Geren Shasta Lake, CA 96089
Full analysis of this comment →

Sharing & methodology

These results are meant to be shared.

Please cite us. This analysis is the intellectual property of Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser. You are welcome to reproduce it — every reproduction must include this citation:

Roadless.org and Nicholas Holshouser, “2001 Roadless Rule Revision — Substantive Analysis,” https://roadless.org.

How it works. A large language model (an open-weight Qwen3.8 model) reads each substantive comment and copies, word for word, the passages that carry its analytical gap, evidence, request, alternative and connection to the place; it returns no scores. Code grades those passages 0–3 on eight dimensions — evidence, legal grounding, engagement with the environmental analysis, analytical gaps, alternatives, specific requests, position, and local knowledge — with legal grounding taken from a citation scan, not the model. For the strongest tenth on each side, the copied passages are checked against the comment and shown as exhibits. A comment counts as “substantive” when it clears a floor filter — it must show at least one substantive signal (a named entity, a specific citation, a stated analytical deficiency, or first-person testimony), which screens out one-line and purely conclusory submissions before any model scoring.

The full method. Every step, why it is done that way, its known limits and a glossary: Methodologies →

The data. The full canonical dataset — every comment on Docket FS-2025-0001 — is available from Regulations.gov's bulk download, the canonical source: https://www.regulations.gov/bulkdownload. Download the CSV directly (Regulations.gov keeps this link working until October 18, 2026): https://bulk-downloads.regulations.gov/mv4-z8fw-q5jx.csv.

Roadless.org — analysis of the public comment docket.
Media inquiries welcome — nicholas@wanderingnature.com.