Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-604906

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

What it names

Law cited
66 FR 3244

Attachments

1 file. Counts as 1 — Counts as one: The attachments enclose no one else's submissions; the comment counts as one.

  • Own letter

The comment

I strongly oppose the proposed administrative rescission of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule (66 FR 3244). Repealing these protections will not provide the benefits cited as the rationale for this action and will deeply undercut the economic, environmental, and cultural assets of this land. FULL COMMENT ATTACHED

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless