Comment Analysis · Docket FS-2025-0001

FS-2025-0001-612303

Opposes rescissionPosted October 7, 2026 On Regulations.gov

Not scored for substance: the comment does not clear the floor of substantive signal.

Topics

What it names

Law cited
91 Fed. Reg. 5391 Fed. Reg. 57

Attachments

1 file. Counts as 1 — Counts as one: The attachments enclose no one else's submissions; the comment counts as one.

  • Supporting material

The comment

Please find an additional attachment for the recently-submitted comments of the Southern Environmental Law Center ("SELC") et al. opposing rescission of the Roadless Rule (Comment Tracking Number: mux-6bsw-j95t). Our previous submissions included the following text: Please refer to the 10/02/2026 letter from the Southern Environmental Law Center submitted with confirmation #mur-5suc-54st, for information regarding our attachments in support of our comments. The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) is submitting these and other documents as attachments to our forthcoming comments on the Proposed Rule, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Cost Benefit Analysis, and other rulemaking documents related to the Forest Service’s proposed rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule (FS–2025–0001/RIN 0596–AD66; 91 Fed. Reg. 53,827 (Aug. 20, 2026); 91 Fed. Reg. 57,841 (Sept. 11, 2026)). Our comments will explain the relevance of these and all other attachments.

Keep learning. Keep speaking up.The Roadless Rule depends on public engagement. Share what you've learned.

© 2026 roadless.org - Defending America's Last Wild Forests

Privacy Policy|Questions or concerns? noroads@roadless.org|Follow us: @defendroadless